什么是已动用资本回报率
已动用资本回报率(Return on Capital Employed)用于衡量资本投资效益指标，是显示公司资本投资效益及盈利能力的比率。换句话说， 已动用资本回报率是衡量公司运用资本产生回报情况的一个指标。
一般来说，已动用资本回报率应该高于公司的借贷利率，否则的话，就会减少股东收益。
已动用资本回报率的计算公式
已动用资本回报率的计算方法是，用息税前利润(EBIT)除以总资产和流动负债的差值。
|
ROCE＝ |
EBIT | |
| Total Assets – Current Liabilities |
|
＝ |
Operating Profit+interest | |
| Equity Shareholders’ Funds+longterm borrowing |
Return on Capital Employed Ratio
The Return on Capital Employed ratio (ROCE) tells us how much profit we earn from the investments the shareholders have made in their company. Think of it this way: if we had a savings account with a bank and we’d been paid, say, ￡25 interest at the end of a year; and we had saved ￡500, we could work out the rate of interest we had earned:
已动用资本回报率向我们展示从股东的投资中得到了多少收益。试着这样想：如果我们有一个银行存款账户，在每年年底能收到25英镑的利息；我们往这个账户里存了500英镑，然后就可以计算出我们赚得的利息率是多少。
So, we have earned 5% interest on our savings.
由上可得：我们在存款中赚到了5%的利息。
Imagine now that instead of talking about a savings account, we were talking about a company and the profit for the year and its capital employed had been ￡25 and ￡500 respectively then the ROCE for that company would be 5% too.
然后换一种方式想象存款账户，我们之前讨论一个公司，它一年的收益以及动用的资本分别是25镑和500镑，所以这个公司的资本回报率也等于5%。
Did you notice that we use the Equity Shareholders’ Funds instead of Capital Employed? In fact, they are different names for the same thing! We could call the ratio the Return on Shareholders’ Funds (ROSF) just as easily if we wanted; but generations of accountants and students only know it as ROCE.
In accounting, there can be different definitions of what certain terms mean. The use of the term ‘capital employed’ can mean different things. It can, for example, include bank loans and overdrafts since these are funds employed within the firm. Because there are different interpretations of what ROCE can mean, it is suggested that you use a method which you feel comfortable with but be aware that others may interpret your definition in a different way. Below is a guide to some of the interpretations that we have found on this issue.
| Source and/or Definition of Return | Definition of Capital Employed |
|---|---|
| Elliott & Elliott: ROCE = Net profit/capital employed | Capital employed = total assets |
| Investor Words: | Capital employed = fixed assets + current assets – current liabilities |
| investopedia.com: Return = Profit before tax + interest paid | Capital employed = ordinary share capital + reserves + preference share capital + minority interest + provisions + total borrowings – intangible assets |
| Holmes & Sugden: Return = trading profit plus income from investment and company share of the profit of associates | TRADING capital employed = share capital + reserves + all borrowings including lease obligations, overdraft, minority interest, provisions, associates and investments |
| OVERALL capital employed = share capital + reserves + all borrowings including lease obligations, overdraft, minority interest, provisions | |
| DTI | Capital employed = total fixed assets + current assets – (current liabilities + long term liabilities + provisions) |
| Johnson Matthey Annual Report & Accounts | Capital employed = fixed assets + current assets – (creditors + provisions) |
Let’s calculate the ROCE for the Carphone Warehouse now; and here are the figures we need:
| Carphone Warehouse | 31 March 2001 | 25 March 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| ￡’000 | ￡’000 | |
| Profit for the financial period | 38,159 | 16,327 |
| Equity shareholders’ funds | 436,758 | 44,190 |
Off you go!
Did you get this?
What do we think of these results? Well, the question we have to ask is
“Could we have earned more money (profit) if we had invested in a different business or simply put our money in the bank?”
Well, interest rates at the bank were somewhere around 4 or 5% in 2001 so we did better than that; but there are many businesses that have a ROCE of higher than 8 or 9%. Still, in 2000 the Carphone Warehouse had an ROCE of almost 37%: that’s very good by all standards.
So what went wrong between 2000 and 2001? What happened, it didn’t necessarily go wrong, was that the capital employed increased from ￡44,190,000 to ￡436,758,000 (a 10 fold increase) BUT the profits increased from ￡16,327 to only ￡38,159… they only just about doubled.
It’s no surprise then that the ROCE fell so sharply as capital employed increased 5 times faster than the profit did.
It will be interesting to see what 2002 brings for the Carphone Warehouse and their ROCE.
We will look at Vodafone’s ROCE shortly, but for interest here are some other ROCE values to compare with the Carphone Warehouse:
| Leisure & Hotels | International Airline | Manufacturer | Retailer | Discount Airline | Refining | Pizza Restaurants | Accounting Software | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCE | 5.56% | 3.16% | -12.12% | -0.12% | 33.63% | 16.17% | 16.14% | 16.29% |
Again, these other ROCE values demonstrate that not everyone can get the same results for the same ratio at the same time: it depends on the industry, the management, the economy and so on.
The ROCE results in this new table relate to the Carphone Warehouse’s results for the year ended 25 March 2000 of 36.95%. This is a good result as it shows that the business is effectively earning around 37% on the (investment) funds that the shareholders have invested in it.
Contrast the other ROCE values with the Carphone Warehouse and we can see that only the discount airline has a ROCE value anywhere near it. The international airline’s ROCE is extremely low at just over 3%. Wouldn’t the shareholders be better off selling the business and putting the money in the bank as it would earn more than that?
We should also compare these ROCE values with the profitability values. Let’s just compare net profitability with the ROCE.
| Leisure & Hotels | International Airline | Manufacturer | Retailer | Discount Airline | Refining | Pizza Restaurants | Accounting Software | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Profit | 7.36% | 4.05% | -10.48% | 1.63% | 10.87% | 12.63% | 7.55% | 27.15% |
| ROCE | 5.56% | 3.16% | -12.12% | -0.12% | 33.63% | 16.17% | 16.14% | 16.29% |
Putting the data from this table on a graph can help us to see if there is a relationship between them:
Image:Net Profft Margin.gif
There does seem to be a relationship between the net profit margin and the ROCE: the higher the net profit margin, the higher the ROCE. After all, the curve on this graph is not a straight line and it might even be a true curve meaning that the relationship is more complex than we might think. Keep an eye on this relationship whenever you assess the profitability of a business.
相关文献
资本回报率